Study Questions 'Cognitive Meritocracy': Abstract Intelligence as Society's Ticket

An article by Deniz Fraemke published in AI & SOCIETY argues that many societies are built on a peculiar hierarchy: cognitive performance has become the key to education, employment, and recognition. Particularly, abstract reasoning, analytical problem-solving, and planning are treated as 'higher-level' abilities, while manual skills, sensory precision, and routine thinking are labeled as 'lower-level' competencies.

According to Fraemke, this is not a neutral order but a valuation that favors people with tendencies towards abstract thinking, while simultaneously downplaying other forms of talent. When such valuation is reflected in institutions—such as which skills are rewarded and what is considered valuable—privilege can accumulate for those whose strengths align with the system's metrics.

The article also highlights the biological dimension: cognitive abilities are partially hereditary, so elevating them as a measure of societal success resembles a biological lottery system, according to Fraemke. In this case, an advantage may appear as 'merit,' even though it is related to genetic and developmental starting points.

Fraemke emphasizes that the issue is not just about ethics but about structure: when societal recognition and opportunities are tied to a certain type of cognition, the consequences extend beyond individual choices.

Source: The end of cognitive meritocracy, AI & SOCIETY.